UESI-Delhi has been divided into 7 regions: East, West, North, South, Central, South-West and North-West. Each region can have Regional Committee (this will suffice for now). Each Regional Committee can comprise of at least Regional Secretary, Regional Treasurer and 2 students members (plus staff as ex-officio). Each region can then plan for its own, and implement the plans accordingly. The regions can include EC, DTC, LTC etc in their planning, but urged to keep those days reserved for combined programmes of all regions free.
This concept of regionalisation was initiated in 2005. There were various reasons why such initiative was taken. Firstly, it was felt that when programmes were organised not everybody could take part actively though there was such desire. Reason being that 20 graduates were not required to run a camp of 40 students! But regionalisation would enable every member to take part without overcrowding the programme. And with the number of students increasing every year it was required to organise to more camps instead of having one BIG camp. And with students having different calender it was all the more plausible to organise more camps. Hence, regionalisation was initiated for more participation from the members.
Secondly, having a centralised programmes constraint only few graduates to take part in a programme . But these few graduates cannot do the follow up alone because the size of the city was just too large for effective centralised follow-up. But if programmes were organised at a regional level, there could be more graduates and all these graduates would have established relationship with the students. And therefore follow-up would become much more efficient.
Thirdly, as ministry grew in size there was the need to organise more programmes; and sometimes different kinds of programmes too. Organising all of these centrally was getting too taxing for the committee members. So it was felt that regionalistion would help the committee members to attend to other things, and let them coordinate only those things which would be really necessary to conduct centrally.
This concept of regionalisation was initiated in 2005. There were various reasons why such initiative was taken. Firstly, it was felt that when programmes were organised not everybody could take part actively though there was such desire. Reason being that 20 graduates were not required to run a camp of 40 students! But regionalisation would enable every member to take part without overcrowding the programme. And with the number of students increasing every year it was required to organise to more camps instead of having one BIG camp. And with students having different calender it was all the more plausible to organise more camps. Hence, regionalisation was initiated for more participation from the members.
Secondly, having a centralised programmes constraint only few graduates to take part in a programme . But these few graduates cannot do the follow up alone because the size of the city was just too large for effective centralised follow-up. But if programmes were organised at a regional level, there could be more graduates and all these graduates would have established relationship with the students. And therefore follow-up would become much more efficient.
Thirdly, as ministry grew in size there was the need to organise more programmes; and sometimes different kinds of programmes too. Organising all of these centrally was getting too taxing for the committee members. So it was felt that regionalistion would help the committee members to attend to other things, and let them coordinate only those things which would be really necessary to conduct centrally.
Comments