Skip to main content

Heaven



New Testament scholar and Bishop of Durham, N. T. Wright talks about life after "life-after-death" and heaven not being our ultimate destiny. What do you say?

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1710844,00.html

Comments

Anonymous said…
ur Wright :-)

why are there no comments!!!
Sao Tunyi said…
Some general remarks first.

• Putting up this topic, people may think that we just love to pick controversial issues and fight all the time. So I was a little hesitant to respond. But I believe that’s not true.

• Quiet time we know is very necessary. We should encourage one another to have a devotional life. But we all agree with one another and what is there big enough to discuss and debate about?

• Christians do not hide uncomfortable issues under the carpet. As much as building up, we are also to ‘do away with’ and ‘to tear down’.

• It is interesting to note that many of our Christian doctrines became formulated as believers responded to heresies, e.g. doctrine of Trinity. They were not ‘just there’ from the beginning.

• Jt has rightly put it in the previous debate that “even good biblical scholarship admits to its own limitation on the possibility of future re-interpretation (excluding those re-interpretations of its core beliefs…)

With the ‘left behind’ school of thought dominating the shelves of our Christian book stores, and the type of teaching in Sunday school that we grew up with, “it (may) therefore comes as something of a shock that Wright doesn't believe in heaven — at least, not in the way that millions of Christians understand the term” (I hope you’ve read the link above).
What Wright has been saying is that nowhere in the Bible is written that when we die, we’ll go to heaven, or Jesus is risen so we’ll go to heaven. The Bible rather says that Jesus is risen, new creation has begun. It says that Christ is coming here, to join together the heavens and the Earth in an act of new creation. Wright says that heaven (if you want to use that word) is an intermediate state and we’ll all be raised bodily into the new creation. That the creation is basically good is the original Jewish understanding of reality, and the world as intrinsically evil and salvation an escape from reality into a disembodied state is Plato’s.

Someone can please contribute in discussing the apocalyptic texts and the implications of having the correct view of heaven.

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution and Creation

Evolution and/or Creation has generated so much of discussion. Whether we like or not the controversy is likely to continue for some more time. Textbooks on Biology are filled with ideas undergirded by the theory of evolution. Christians take on the issue has been diverse. Some see evolution as opposed to the teaching of the Bible underscored in Genesis 1-2. Others see it differently. Young Earth Creationists interpret the Genesis text ‘literally’, and concluded that God created the heavens and the earth some 6,000 to 10,000 years back. Ministries like Answers in Genesis, Creation Ministries International and Creation Science Research etc are proponents of this view. For them theory of evolution is not true and it “propagates an anti-biblical religion”. ( Refuting Evolution , Jonathan Sarfati). Others like Phillip Johnson, William Dembski, Michael Behe, Lee Strobel et al have a different take. Intelligent Design movement’s, perhaps, most able proponent Phillip Johnson in his cha

Welcome to Delhi-UESI

UESI seeks to evangelise post-matric students in India, nurture them as disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, that they may serve the Church and Society. UESI's doctrinal basis shall be the fundamental, historic truths of Christianity including: 1. The unity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit in the Godhead. 2. The sovereignty of God in creation, revelation, redemption and final judgment. 3. The divine inspiration and infallibility of Holy Scripture as originally given, and its supreme authority in all matters of faith and conduct. 4. The universal sinfulness and guilt of human nature since the Fall, rendering man subject to God's wrath and condemnation. 5. Redemption from the guilt, penalty, and power of sin only through the sacrificial death of Jesus Christ, the incarnate Son of God. 6. The resurrection of Jesus from the dead. 7. The necessity of the work of the Holy Spirit to make the death of Christ effective to the individual sinner, granting him repentance toward G

Should Christians support that Indian Penal Code decrimillize homosexual practice?

This is a subject that Christians who are students of Social Science has much to say. The primary reason is because when it comes issues on interaction between governance and Christian ethics someone studying Computer Engineering or Geography or something of that sort is not taught in his or her classroom about governance or about Christian ethics. Students who study Political Science know better , or are supposed to, about governance than others. But we need to first ask ourselves what the Bible say about homosexuality. Read the first few chapters of Genesis and one cannot possibly miss out that God first created one male and one female. And it is this one male and one female that God united them in marriage. In the New Testament Jesus went on to quote the Genesis account to make his point about marriage. If Jesus himself affirmed the authority of the Genesis account who are we, after all, to deny the authority of Genesis! To be precise, God's design is that physical union must