Skip to main content

Agnosticism and Atheism; why people hold to such views


I’m ready to be a “fool” for the cross, the resurrection, the Virgin Birth and may be many more other reasons. But I can not afford to be a fool by interpreting the initial chapters of the Genesis as a Science text book and thereby hinder many brilliant scientists from accepting the God of the Bible. The more and more I read, I’m more and more convinced that these scientists became agnostics or atheists not because of the sciences but because of the way Christians interpret the Bible and the way they live. Definitely what we believe and what we profess has a bearing on other peoples’ beliefs.
I don’t really bother whether Darwin’s theories stand or fall. Neither am I going to rejoice or lament if it is proven to be false. A Christian who has accepted the theory of evolution by properly understanding the Bible and the theory (of evolution) and come to the conclusion that they do not necessarily conflict one another has nothing to lose even if the theory (of evolution) is proven to be wrong. (Of course that does not mean that we should twist and turn the Biblical truths to accommodate more views in the pursuit of relevance). But someone who believes that the Bible and the theory (of evolution) contradicts one another will not only lose his faith when he realizes that indeed the theory is true but will also jeopardize the faith of many others who take the theory seriously.
It is worth to analyze thoroughly why people like Karl Marx and Darwin lose their faith in the God of the Bible, in whose names countless Christians and people of other faiths were slaughtered. Did Darwin lose his faith due to his scientific theories? Perhaps might be, but not entirely. Look at the history of the church during his time.
I believe both Marx and Darwin were very good human beings (good in the sense as is usually understood by the world) although they do not see eye to eye on various issues. They both love their neighbors much more than many of the professing Christians today. I’m sure they both will be horrified to see the slaughters being committed in their names. It is interesting to note that they both were brought up in a Christian environment. While Darwin goes to study divinity at Cambridge, Marx baptized and loses his faith (probably) due to his friendship with a group of so-called ‘radical’ theologians.
I believe that Christians need to be more compassionate to people like Darwin and Marx. Of course that does not mean that Christians should advocate their theories. No, not at all! But we need to analyze why they hold such (atheistic or agnostic) views before condemning them as “satanic”. Chances are that they rejected the God of the Bible because of the way Christians project the Scripture. Yes there are many who try to cling on the shield of atheism (for whom I have much less compassion) because of their moral bankruptcy, intellectual laziness and in their pursuit of ‘freedom from the Judgment and moral obligations’. But there are certainly people like our very own Mahatma (who actually is not an agnostic or atheist) who claimed that he rejected Jesus because of the Christians. And many who rejected the God of the Bible had no other alternatives but end up being agnostics.
Hence I would like to throw a discussion on “Agnosticism and Atheism; why people hold to such views?”
Views, opinions and comments are welcome on this topic as well as on what has been written above.

Comments

Yes, it may be true that some Christians view of the Bible may have turned away people. I am not sure about this since I have not seen in myself.

But I definitely do not agree that brilliant scientists are kept away from God because of the first few chapters of the Bible. That is a propagated view and from whatever I have seen it is not true. There is nothing wrong with the first few chapters of the Bible.

The truth claims of the first few chapters and some of the truth claims of macro evolution are equivalent as far as a scientific
view is concerned. Both are not repeatable and physically observable. So as long as human minds are finite, there is no question of past evolution or creation getting proven.

God's dealings in the past in the present and in the future are provided to us by revelation. Not by scientific experimentation.

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution and Creation

Evolution and/or Creation has generated so much of discussion. Whether we like or not the controversy is likely to continue for some more time. Textbooks on Biology are filled with ideas undergirded by the theory of evolution. Christians take on the issue has been diverse. Some see evolution as opposed to the teaching of the Bible underscored in Genesis 1-2. Others see it differently. Young Earth Creationists interpret the Genesis text ‘literally’, and concluded that God created the heavens and the earth some 6,000 to 10,000 years back. Ministries like Answers in Genesis, Creation Ministries International and Creation Science Research etc are proponents of this view. For them theory of evolution is not true and it “propagates an anti-biblical religion”. ( Refuting Evolution , Jonathan Sarfati). Others like Phillip Johnson, William Dembski, Michael Behe, Lee Strobel et al have a different take. Intelligent Design movement’s, perhaps, most able proponent Phillip Johnson in his cha

Welcome to Delhi-UESI

UESI seeks to evangelise post-matric students in India, nurture them as disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, that they may serve the Church and Society. UESI's doctrinal basis shall be the fundamental, historic truths of Christianity including: 1. The unity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit in the Godhead. 2. The sovereignty of God in creation, revelation, redemption and final judgment. 3. The divine inspiration and infallibility of Holy Scripture as originally given, and its supreme authority in all matters of faith and conduct. 4. The universal sinfulness and guilt of human nature since the Fall, rendering man subject to God's wrath and condemnation. 5. Redemption from the guilt, penalty, and power of sin only through the sacrificial death of Jesus Christ, the incarnate Son of God. 6. The resurrection of Jesus from the dead. 7. The necessity of the work of the Holy Spirit to make the death of Christ effective to the individual sinner, granting him repentance toward G

Should Christians support that Indian Penal Code decrimillize homosexual practice?

This is a subject that Christians who are students of Social Science has much to say. The primary reason is because when it comes issues on interaction between governance and Christian ethics someone studying Computer Engineering or Geography or something of that sort is not taught in his or her classroom about governance or about Christian ethics. Students who study Political Science know better , or are supposed to, about governance than others. But we need to first ask ourselves what the Bible say about homosexuality. Read the first few chapters of Genesis and one cannot possibly miss out that God first created one male and one female. And it is this one male and one female that God united them in marriage. In the New Testament Jesus went on to quote the Genesis account to make his point about marriage. If Jesus himself affirmed the authority of the Genesis account who are we, after all, to deny the authority of Genesis! To be precise, God's design is that physical union must