Skip to main content

Discussion on Reservation

By
Recently there was a debate on the RESERVATION issue in Vinoth Ramachandra's blog between Manasi and sao tunyi. The blog post was on health care and as the debate diverted from the main topic (although the relation between the two are also topic for discussion), it was suggested that the discussion be carried over to another site. So here we are, open to anyone who would like to join in and comment on the issue of reservation.

To see what already transpired in Vinoth's blog, click here
Labels:

Comments

Sao Tunyi said…
Anti-Reservationists argue that 50% Reservation is too much as the NSSO data (2000) shows that OBC population is only 41% and not 52% as the Mandal Commission Report estimated.

In his article ‘Doubts over data’, T.K RajaLakshmi argues that there are serious problems with the use of NSSO data to estimate OBC population. The NSSO 1999-2000 was not primarily to count OBC population, but by taking samples of different social groups, it tries to identify key indicators for employment and unemployment. The OBC population derived at was therefore just an estimate and not enumeration of the proportion of the OBC population to the total population. The NSSO admits that!! Same for National Family Health Surveys.

Except for ST population, the other OBC and SC groups are scattered and are impossible to count, unless there is a decennial census-like exercise to count which will take 4-5 years. The Mandal Commission makes use of the 1931 and estimated the OBC population to be 52%. The Commission clarifies that by offering a few thousand jobs to OBC candidates; it would not be possible to take 52% of the population forward.

Some others argue that OBC population is 60-70%, but I’m not aware of any such official figures in recent times. The census’ caste wise counting was stopped after 1931.

However, going back to the NSSO figures give valuable insights. Those who use 41% to oppose reservation don’t mention this. Rajalakshmi notes that in that NSSO round,
“Upper-caste Hindus, who make up 37% of the urban population, accounted for 66% of all non-technical subject graduates, 65% of medical graduates, 67% of engineering and technical graduates and 62% of graduates in agricultural sciences. In the total sample of 2.24 lakh persons, 1,359 had engineering degrees, 908 (66.8%) of them upper-caste Hindus and 202 OBCs (Hindu). Of the 535 doctors in the sample, 350 (65%) were upper-caste Hindus and only 56 were Hindu OBCs. Among the 17,501 non-technical graduates, 11,529(65%) were upper-caste Hindus and 2,402 were OBCs”.

50% Reservation is no way too much.
April 30, 2010 at 10:29 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evolution and Creation

By
Evolution and/or Creation has generated so much of discussion. Whether we like or not the controversy is likely to continue for some more time. Textbooks on Biology are filled with ideas undergirded by the theory of evolution. Christians take on the issue has been diverse. Some see evolution as opposed to the teaching of the Bible underscored in Genesis 1-2. Others see it differently. Young Earth Creationists interpret the Genesis text ‘literally’, and concluded that God created the heavens and the earth some 6,000 to 10,000 years back. Ministries like Answers in Genesis, Creation Ministries International and Creation Science Research etc are proponents of this view. For them theory of evolution is not true and it “propagates an anti-biblical religion”. ( Refuting Evolution , Jonathan Sarfati). Others like Phillip Johnson, William Dembski, Michael Behe, Lee Strobel et al have a different take. Intelligent Design movement’s, perhaps, most able proponent Phillip Johnson in his cha
30 comments
Read more

Welcome to Delhi-UESI

By
UESI seeks to evangelise post-matric students in India, nurture them as disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, that they may serve the Church and Society. UESI's doctrinal basis shall be the fundamental, historic truths of Christianity including: 1. The unity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit in the Godhead. 2. The sovereignty of God in creation, revelation, redemption and final judgment. 3. The divine inspiration and infallibility of Holy Scripture as originally given, and its supreme authority in all matters of faith and conduct. 4. The universal sinfulness and guilt of human nature since the Fall, rendering man subject to God's wrath and condemnation. 5. Redemption from the guilt, penalty, and power of sin only through the sacrificial death of Jesus Christ, the incarnate Son of God. 6. The resurrection of Jesus from the dead. 7. The necessity of the work of the Holy Spirit to make the death of Christ effective to the individual sinner, granting him repentance toward G
10 comments
Read more

Should Christians support that Indian Penal Code decrimillize homosexual practice?

By
This is a subject that Christians who are students of Social Science has much to say. The primary reason is because when it comes issues on interaction between governance and Christian ethics someone studying Computer Engineering or Geography or something of that sort is not taught in his or her classroom about governance or about Christian ethics. Students who study Political Science know better , or are supposed to, about governance than others. But we need to first ask ourselves what the Bible say about homosexuality. Read the first few chapters of Genesis and one cannot possibly miss out that God first created one male and one female. And it is this one male and one female that God united them in marriage. In the New Testament Jesus went on to quote the Genesis account to make his point about marriage. If Jesus himself affirmed the authority of the Genesis account who are we, after all, to deny the authority of Genesis! To be precise, God's design is that physical union must
6 comments
Read more